London Economics shines light on skills gaps holding back UK productivity
A new analysis quantifying how skills gaps impact business outcomes is being used by London EdTech pioneer Filtered in its corporate learning recommendation engine
Leading economics consultancy London Economics has analysed the Employer Skills Survey (https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/ukces-employer-skills-survey-2015-uk-report) to identify and quantify how shortfalls in skills are impacting UK firms through loss of business to competitors, delayed development and increased operating costs.
“This detailed analysis of the consequences of skills gaps, according to type of skill, size of skill gap, business sector, size and geography is allowing Filtered to increase the precision of its prioritisation of learning content for our corporate clients” said Chris Littlewood, Filtered’s Chief Scientific Officer. “Being able to link skills gaps to tangible outcomes, like deals lost to the competition, brings home the urgency of the problem - it’s a productivity imperative not a productivity puzzle.”
London Economics conducted both descriptive and econometric analysis of the Employer Skills Survey 2015, which is based on over 90, 000 interviews with firms of all sizes and sectors across the UK. The resulting correlations have been incorporated into Filtered’s globalfilter learning recommendation engine, prioritising learning content recommendations with a likely higher impact on client firm’s productivity.
Sophie Hedges, the lead economist undertaking the analysis at London Economics, said “the new analysis of the ESS illustrates both the incidence and the adverse impact on firm-level performance associated with a range of different skills gaps. The analysis also provides a strong rationale for firms, irrespective of their size, to invest in skills to rectify the potential negative consequences.”
• Skills gaps in reading and understanding increases the probability that the establishment will lose business to competitors by 6.2 percentage points compared to an establishment with no skills gap in reading and understanding.
• In fact, reading and understanding consistently appears as one of the strongest drivers of negative firm outcomes.
• For SMEs, the incidence of skills gaps increases with firm size (tiny firms tend to be appropriately skilled, but as firms get bigger matching skilled resource to requirements seems to become harder). (Small firms report an incidence of skills gaps of just 2%, compared to 7% for firms with more than 250 employees.)
• But when skills gaps do occur in very small firms, they are more likely to have a major impact (a major impact was reported in 23% of firms where skills gaps were identified).
• Gaps in IT/computer literacy, basic numeracy and complex numerical skills also increase the probability of increasing workload for other staff (by 6.4, 5.2 and 4.1 percentage points respectively).
Filtered are making the research freely available in the hope that it provides a platform for further innovation. Get in touch if you are interested in access or collaboration.
To the research:
To Filtered’s learning recommendation engine, globalfilter: